About Me

Name: OB Busch
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Dems and Do-Gooders

Quick Takes
Why does the Hollywood crowd think that the Melissa Etheridge face
holding kiss on her same sex partner at the Academy Awards will
resonate with 'fly over' country?  (How will it play in Peoria?).
Martin Scorsese directing Jack Nicholson was a must see for me
so I was glad to see The Departed win an Oscar.   


Ouch, My Foot
In the common sense free atmosphere of Washington DC the
democrats went wild with plans to take over the conduct of the
war in Iraq. Last week Congress took a break and most congress
folks went back to their home districts for fund raising and maybe
even meeting with constituents. They ran into common sense.
Cut and run was not the ‘mandate’ of the 2006 elections. While
the vote reflected a frustration with the war in Iraq, the message
was 'we want to win but make it quick and get out of there'.
There was not a desire by the voters to exit Iraq under less than
honorable conditions.
Upon returning to Washington the Democrat party pulled
Jack Murtha’s ‘slow bleed’ strategy off the table. They are also
backing away from changing the terms of the 2002 authorization
to invade Iraq. Soon the ether of power will wipe away the
memory of what they heard back home at which time the
democrats will take careful aim and once again shoot themselves
in the foot.
Solid Entertainment!

WaPo - Democrats Back Away

They Won’t Stop at Smoking
With the many attacks on cigarettes and smokers the precedence
has been established that you can judicate and legislate against
a legal activity and a legal product.  Back in the mid 90’s I wrote
(on the now defunct AOL/ABC message boards) that it would be
better to make tobacco illegal. I feared then that the precedents
set would open the door to attacks on other products that were
deemed politically incorrect.  When the argument that smoking
products should be taxed and sued to pay for the increased cost of
health care required by tobacco users, I knew that in no time at all
anything deemed unhealthy would be legislated against. 
The health issue justified attacks on fast food restaurants.
Some cities have banned trans fats in restaurants. 
What happened to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
Political correctness and junk science know no bounds. 
The latest attack on our right to the pursuit of happiness is
(are you ready?)  Girl Scout Cookies!
A group called National Action Against Obesity.
(Gee! they make it sound like such a noble cause) is attacking
little girls and the cookie sales that keep their organization
afloat.  Why? Because cookies contain fat!  
According to Me Me Roth, president of National Action Against Obesity,
“No civic organization should use junk food as a fund raiser.”
Just how long will it take for a city, a state, or even congress to
codify this quote into law? 
My guess is not long.

National Action against Obesity
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bleeding Out

 

John Murtha wants to throw obstacles at the ability to fight the
 war in Iraq. By putting unrealistic restrictions on the funding
of
the war, he will let the troops 'bleed out' both figuratively and
actually.
To quote. Murtha "They won't have the equipment, they don't
have the training, and they won't be able to work."
As a veteren of the Vietnam War, this is deja vu all over again.
This time, however, the democrat party of surrender is
misreading the public as revealed in this article from Investors
Business Daily.

Investors Business Daily

Even the left leaning Washington Post weighs in against
Murtha's strategy of defeat.

WaPo 2-17-07

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Warming Power

In a click of the mouse you can read all you want on both sides
of the global warming issue. What I will present are some current realities.

The alarmists want us to take action now. If we don’t we are
surely doomed. The most often mentioned immediate action is
to sign on to the Kyoto Protocol.
The reality is that the Senate
voted 95-0 against signing the pact in the 1997 Byrd-Hagel
Resolution. Why? Because the Kyoto Protocol has more to do
with distributing wealth from the ‘have’ nations to the ‘have not’
nations than it does with addressing global warming. Bill Clinton
had plenty of time to sign on, as has George Bush. Neither
President seems willing to buck a 95-0 Senate vote. Gee!

The Kyoto Protocol is not working. None of the countries that
signed it are meeting their emission goals because doing so
would cripple their economies. The biggest flaw of the Kyoto
Protocol is that it exempts China, one of the world’s biggest polluters.

If the United States were to implement the provisions of the
Kyoto Protocol the cost would be a 4.3% reduction in the Gross
Domestic Product. That is a lifestyle change of major proportions
for all of us.
Kyoto type legislation is the route proposed by the
Global Warming Advocates. How much of your lifestyle are you
willing to sacrifice to this altar?

According to Al Gore, the melting arctic ice caps will cause
New York City and almost all of Florida to be underwater. Let’s
revisit our 7th grade Science class for this interesting experiment.
Put some ice cubes in a glass. Fill the glass with water. When
the ice cubes melt will the glass be fuller?

Global warming has been transformed from an interesting
scientific hypothesis to a political belief system because
‘progressives’ want to socialize the economy. There is little
scientific reason to do anything on global warming at this time.
The political reasons would only be to further the agenda of the left.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Super Bowl XLI

 

I'm a big Football fan and the years biggest game is coming up.
The Superbowl. I've seen every one of them (that's scary).
As many observe, it is usually anti-climatic. Teams play to not
lose as opposed to trying to win. Sort of a prevent defense on a
big scale.The most exciting Superbowl in years was
overshadowed by the Janet Jackson fiasco.

Superbowl XLI
will pit the Chicago Bears against the Indianapolis Colts.
The Bears have been a quarterback away from winning
anything for a number of years. Perhaps in this one they still are.
The old adage that defense wins championships may be the
Bears destiny.
As for the Colts. Well there is this Peyton Manning thing.
Like Dan Marino before him, he has the stats, the wins, and the
records but has struggled to get to this game. In past seasons
the Colts have bowed out in the playoffs because of a weakness
that playoff opponants have exploited. The Colts are weak on
the run on both sides of the ball.  It boils down to scoring. If Manning
can move the ball in the air and force Chicago into a passing game,
the Colts will win. If Chicago's defense can hold back the Colts,
then Chicago can control the ball with the run.

I don't have a favorite in this game, so I'll just enjoy the action.

Super Bowl Party Alert.
If you are invited to a Super Bowl party given by casual fans, don't plan
on watching the game. I went to one such party a few years ago
By the third quarter there was 4 of us huddled around the TV trying to
hear the game over the noise and loud music. A young lady walked
past at one point and asked, "Oh there's a football game on ?"

Enjoy the Game

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »